Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh

Patrick J. Culligan, Emil Gurshumov, Christa Lewis, Jennifer L. Priestley, Jodie Komar, Nihar Shah, Charbel Salamon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The objective of this study was to assess outcomes following robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh. Methods: During our study period, all patients who underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy were enrolled in this single-arm prospective trial. Endpoints included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) values; Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, short form 20 (PFDI-20); Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, short form 7 (PFIQ-7); Surgical Satisfaction scores; and the Sandvik Incontinence Severity Index. All surgeries were performed with a pre-configured monofilament type 1 polypropylene Y-mesh (Alyte

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)731-735
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Pelvic Floor
Polypropylenes
Robotics
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Equipment and Supplies
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Urology

Cite this

Culligan, Patrick J. ; Gurshumov, Emil ; Lewis, Christa ; Priestley, Jennifer L. ; Komar, Jodie ; Shah, Nihar ; Salamon, Charbel. / Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh. In: International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 731-735.
@article{bd06522654cf48e79316d9a291dc9fbf,
title = "Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh",
abstract = "Introduction and hypothesis: The objective of this study was to assess outcomes following robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh. Methods: During our study period, all patients who underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy were enrolled in this single-arm prospective trial. Endpoints included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) values; Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, short form 20 (PFDI-20); Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, short form 7 (PFIQ-7); Surgical Satisfaction scores; and the Sandvik Incontinence Severity Index. All surgeries were performed with a pre-configured monofilament type 1 polypropylene Y-mesh (Alyte",
author = "Culligan, {Patrick J.} and Emil Gurshumov and Christa Lewis and Priestley, {Jennifer L.} and Jodie Komar and Nihar Shah and Charbel Salamon",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00192-013-2265-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "731--735",
journal = "International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction",
issn = "0937-3462",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "6",

}

Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh. / Culligan, Patrick J.; Gurshumov, Emil; Lewis, Christa; Priestley, Jennifer L.; Komar, Jodie; Shah, Nihar; Salamon, Charbel.

In: International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Vol. 25, No. 6, 01.01.2014, p. 731-735.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh

AU - Culligan, Patrick J.

AU - Gurshumov, Emil

AU - Lewis, Christa

AU - Priestley, Jennifer L.

AU - Komar, Jodie

AU - Shah, Nihar

AU - Salamon, Charbel

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Introduction and hypothesis: The objective of this study was to assess outcomes following robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh. Methods: During our study period, all patients who underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy were enrolled in this single-arm prospective trial. Endpoints included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) values; Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, short form 20 (PFDI-20); Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, short form 7 (PFIQ-7); Surgical Satisfaction scores; and the Sandvik Incontinence Severity Index. All surgeries were performed with a pre-configured monofilament type 1 polypropylene Y-mesh (Alyte

AB - Introduction and hypothesis: The objective of this study was to assess outcomes following robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh. Methods: During our study period, all patients who underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy were enrolled in this single-arm prospective trial. Endpoints included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) values; Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, short form 20 (PFDI-20); Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, short form 7 (PFIQ-7); Surgical Satisfaction scores; and the Sandvik Incontinence Severity Index. All surgeries were performed with a pre-configured monofilament type 1 polypropylene Y-mesh (Alyte

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903310156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903310156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00192-013-2265-x

DO - 10.1007/s00192-013-2265-x

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 731

EP - 735

JO - International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

JF - International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

SN - 0937-3462

IS - 6

ER -