Palliative Reconstruction for the Management of Incurable Head and Neck Cancer

Amar Miglani, Viraj M. Patel, Carrie S. Stern, Katie E. Weichman, Missak Haigentz, Thomas J. Ow, Evan S. Garfein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Surgical management of head and neck cancer is resource intensive and physiologically demanding. In patients with incurable disease, although the indications for surgery are not well defined, palliative benefit can be significant. The goal of this investigation was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent resection and reconstruction of head and neck cancer with curative intent with those who underwent similar procedures with palliative intent. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent reconstruction for head and neck cancer between 2008 and 2014 was conducted. Patients were divided into curative and palliative groups. Outcomes assessed included postoperative complications and survival. Results A total of 147 patients who underwent 156 operations met inclusion criteria (27 palliative and 129 curative). In both cohorts, the most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and the most common primary tumor site was the oral cavity. There was no significant difference between the cohorts in the rates of systemic and reconstructive complications, postoperative hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and flap survival. Overall survival in palliative patients was significantly shorter compared with curative patients (median OS, 6.2 months vs. 56.1 months, respectively; p < 0.0001). Among patients undergoing palliative surgery, patients without carotid involvement and those with non-SCC were significantly more likely to have longer survival. Conclusion Surgical resection with reconstruction is possible in head and neck oncologic patients undergoing palliative treatment. Palliative patients have similar short-term outcomes when compared with patients undergoing resection for curative intent. Quality-of-life and economic implications of these approaches deserve closer scrutiny.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)226-232
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
Survival
Palliative Care
Length of Stay
Mouth
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Histology
Neck
Head
Economics
Quality of Life
Carcinoma

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Miglani, A., Patel, V. M., Stern, C. S., Weichman, K. E., Haigentz, M., Ow, T. J., & Garfein, E. S. (2016). Palliative Reconstruction for the Management of Incurable Head and Neck Cancer. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 32(3), 226-232. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1568156
Miglani, Amar ; Patel, Viraj M. ; Stern, Carrie S. ; Weichman, Katie E. ; Haigentz, Missak ; Ow, Thomas J. ; Garfein, Evan S. / Palliative Reconstruction for the Management of Incurable Head and Neck Cancer. In: Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 2016 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 226-232.
@article{7ae5f3bd45754b459e646417344f4789,
title = "Palliative Reconstruction for the Management of Incurable Head and Neck Cancer",
abstract = "Background Surgical management of head and neck cancer is resource intensive and physiologically demanding. In patients with incurable disease, although the indications for surgery are not well defined, palliative benefit can be significant. The goal of this investigation was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent resection and reconstruction of head and neck cancer with curative intent with those who underwent similar procedures with palliative intent. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent reconstruction for head and neck cancer between 2008 and 2014 was conducted. Patients were divided into curative and palliative groups. Outcomes assessed included postoperative complications and survival. Results A total of 147 patients who underwent 156 operations met inclusion criteria (27 palliative and 129 curative). In both cohorts, the most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and the most common primary tumor site was the oral cavity. There was no significant difference between the cohorts in the rates of systemic and reconstructive complications, postoperative hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and flap survival. Overall survival in palliative patients was significantly shorter compared with curative patients (median OS, 6.2 months vs. 56.1 months, respectively; p < 0.0001). Among patients undergoing palliative surgery, patients without carotid involvement and those with non-SCC were significantly more likely to have longer survival. Conclusion Surgical resection with reconstruction is possible in head and neck oncologic patients undergoing palliative treatment. Palliative patients have similar short-term outcomes when compared with patients undergoing resection for curative intent. Quality-of-life and economic implications of these approaches deserve closer scrutiny.",
author = "Amar Miglani and Patel, {Viraj M.} and Stern, {Carrie S.} and Weichman, {Katie E.} and Missak Haigentz and Ow, {Thomas J.} and Garfein, {Evan S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0035-1568156",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "226--232",
journal = "Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery",
issn = "0743-684X",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "3",

}

Palliative Reconstruction for the Management of Incurable Head and Neck Cancer. / Miglani, Amar; Patel, Viraj M.; Stern, Carrie S.; Weichman, Katie E.; Haigentz, Missak; Ow, Thomas J.; Garfein, Evan S.

In: Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 226-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Palliative Reconstruction for the Management of Incurable Head and Neck Cancer

AU - Miglani, Amar

AU - Patel, Viraj M.

AU - Stern, Carrie S.

AU - Weichman, Katie E.

AU - Haigentz, Missak

AU - Ow, Thomas J.

AU - Garfein, Evan S.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Background Surgical management of head and neck cancer is resource intensive and physiologically demanding. In patients with incurable disease, although the indications for surgery are not well defined, palliative benefit can be significant. The goal of this investigation was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent resection and reconstruction of head and neck cancer with curative intent with those who underwent similar procedures with palliative intent. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent reconstruction for head and neck cancer between 2008 and 2014 was conducted. Patients were divided into curative and palliative groups. Outcomes assessed included postoperative complications and survival. Results A total of 147 patients who underwent 156 operations met inclusion criteria (27 palliative and 129 curative). In both cohorts, the most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and the most common primary tumor site was the oral cavity. There was no significant difference between the cohorts in the rates of systemic and reconstructive complications, postoperative hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and flap survival. Overall survival in palliative patients was significantly shorter compared with curative patients (median OS, 6.2 months vs. 56.1 months, respectively; p < 0.0001). Among patients undergoing palliative surgery, patients without carotid involvement and those with non-SCC were significantly more likely to have longer survival. Conclusion Surgical resection with reconstruction is possible in head and neck oncologic patients undergoing palliative treatment. Palliative patients have similar short-term outcomes when compared with patients undergoing resection for curative intent. Quality-of-life and economic implications of these approaches deserve closer scrutiny.

AB - Background Surgical management of head and neck cancer is resource intensive and physiologically demanding. In patients with incurable disease, although the indications for surgery are not well defined, palliative benefit can be significant. The goal of this investigation was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent resection and reconstruction of head and neck cancer with curative intent with those who underwent similar procedures with palliative intent. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent reconstruction for head and neck cancer between 2008 and 2014 was conducted. Patients were divided into curative and palliative groups. Outcomes assessed included postoperative complications and survival. Results A total of 147 patients who underwent 156 operations met inclusion criteria (27 palliative and 129 curative). In both cohorts, the most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and the most common primary tumor site was the oral cavity. There was no significant difference between the cohorts in the rates of systemic and reconstructive complications, postoperative hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and flap survival. Overall survival in palliative patients was significantly shorter compared with curative patients (median OS, 6.2 months vs. 56.1 months, respectively; p < 0.0001). Among patients undergoing palliative surgery, patients without carotid involvement and those with non-SCC were significantly more likely to have longer survival. Conclusion Surgical resection with reconstruction is possible in head and neck oncologic patients undergoing palliative treatment. Palliative patients have similar short-term outcomes when compared with patients undergoing resection for curative intent. Quality-of-life and economic implications of these approaches deserve closer scrutiny.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960074705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960074705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0035-1568156

DO - 10.1055/s-0035-1568156

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 226

EP - 232

JO - Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery

JF - Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery

SN - 0743-684X

IS - 3

ER -