Increasing patient preparedness for sacral neuromodulation improves patient reported outcomes despite leaving objective measures of success unchanged

Farzeen Firoozi, Bradley Gill, Michael S. Ingber, Courtenay K. Moore, Raymond R. Rackley, Howard B. Goldman, Sandip P. Vasavada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed how a group shared appointment influenced patient preparedness for sacral nerve stimulation for refractory overactive bladder and/or urge urinary incontinence. We also evaluated subjective and objective outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients considering sacral nerve stimulation were prospectively enrolled and invited to attend a group shared appointment. This 75-minute presentation included a question and answer period with an implanting surgeon and an implanted patient. Control patients received standard office counseling. A patient preparedness questionnaire was completed after the group shared appointment or office counseling. Response to treatment was determined using the postoperative satisfaction questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and voiding diaries. Results: In our study 36 women with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 15 years underwent sacral nerve stimulation. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the 19 women who attended the group shared appointment and the 17 controls. Overall preparedness was greater in the shared appointment group (p = 0.043) with better understanding of the purpose of (p = 0.003) and alternatives to (p = 0.043) sacral nerve stimulation. Significantly more women in the shared appointment group than controls felt completely prepared (78.9% vs 29.4%, p = 0.003) and completely satisfied (78.9% vs 35.3%, p = 0.003) with sacral nerve stimulation as well as very much better (68.4% vs 17.6%, p = 0.002) according to the PGI-I. There was no difference between the groups in the number of women with a 50% or greater symptom reduction on voiding diary. Conclusions: Participating in a group shared appointment before sacral nerve stimulation improved patient preparedness and perceived outcomes of treatment, although there was no difference in objective outcomes based on voiding diary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)594-597
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume190
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Appointments and Schedules
Counseling
Urge Urinary Incontinence
Overactive Urinary Bladder
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patient Satisfaction
Demography
Control Groups
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology

Cite this

Firoozi, Farzeen ; Gill, Bradley ; Ingber, Michael S. ; Moore, Courtenay K. ; Rackley, Raymond R. ; Goldman, Howard B. ; Vasavada, Sandip P. / Increasing patient preparedness for sacral neuromodulation improves patient reported outcomes despite leaving objective measures of success unchanged. In: Journal of Urology. 2013 ; Vol. 190, No. 2. pp. 594-597.
@article{4aa222d4c7594542b8e4bd4127a95764,
title = "Increasing patient preparedness for sacral neuromodulation improves patient reported outcomes despite leaving objective measures of success unchanged",
abstract = "Purpose: We assessed how a group shared appointment influenced patient preparedness for sacral nerve stimulation for refractory overactive bladder and/or urge urinary incontinence. We also evaluated subjective and objective outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients considering sacral nerve stimulation were prospectively enrolled and invited to attend a group shared appointment. This 75-minute presentation included a question and answer period with an implanting surgeon and an implanted patient. Control patients received standard office counseling. A patient preparedness questionnaire was completed after the group shared appointment or office counseling. Response to treatment was determined using the postoperative satisfaction questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and voiding diaries. Results: In our study 36 women with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 15 years underwent sacral nerve stimulation. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the 19 women who attended the group shared appointment and the 17 controls. Overall preparedness was greater in the shared appointment group (p = 0.043) with better understanding of the purpose of (p = 0.003) and alternatives to (p = 0.043) sacral nerve stimulation. Significantly more women in the shared appointment group than controls felt completely prepared (78.9{\%} vs 29.4{\%}, p = 0.003) and completely satisfied (78.9{\%} vs 35.3{\%}, p = 0.003) with sacral nerve stimulation as well as very much better (68.4{\%} vs 17.6{\%}, p = 0.002) according to the PGI-I. There was no difference between the groups in the number of women with a 50{\%} or greater symptom reduction on voiding diary. Conclusions: Participating in a group shared appointment before sacral nerve stimulation improved patient preparedness and perceived outcomes of treatment, although there was no difference in objective outcomes based on voiding diary.",
author = "Farzeen Firoozi and Bradley Gill and Ingber, {Michael S.} and Moore, {Courtenay K.} and Rackley, {Raymond R.} and Goldman, {Howard B.} and Vasavada, {Sandip P.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "190",
pages = "594--597",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Increasing patient preparedness for sacral neuromodulation improves patient reported outcomes despite leaving objective measures of success unchanged. / Firoozi, Farzeen; Gill, Bradley; Ingber, Michael S.; Moore, Courtenay K.; Rackley, Raymond R.; Goldman, Howard B.; Vasavada, Sandip P.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 190, No. 2, 01.08.2013, p. 594-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increasing patient preparedness for sacral neuromodulation improves patient reported outcomes despite leaving objective measures of success unchanged

AU - Firoozi, Farzeen

AU - Gill, Bradley

AU - Ingber, Michael S.

AU - Moore, Courtenay K.

AU - Rackley, Raymond R.

AU - Goldman, Howard B.

AU - Vasavada, Sandip P.

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - Purpose: We assessed how a group shared appointment influenced patient preparedness for sacral nerve stimulation for refractory overactive bladder and/or urge urinary incontinence. We also evaluated subjective and objective outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients considering sacral nerve stimulation were prospectively enrolled and invited to attend a group shared appointment. This 75-minute presentation included a question and answer period with an implanting surgeon and an implanted patient. Control patients received standard office counseling. A patient preparedness questionnaire was completed after the group shared appointment or office counseling. Response to treatment was determined using the postoperative satisfaction questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and voiding diaries. Results: In our study 36 women with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 15 years underwent sacral nerve stimulation. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the 19 women who attended the group shared appointment and the 17 controls. Overall preparedness was greater in the shared appointment group (p = 0.043) with better understanding of the purpose of (p = 0.003) and alternatives to (p = 0.043) sacral nerve stimulation. Significantly more women in the shared appointment group than controls felt completely prepared (78.9% vs 29.4%, p = 0.003) and completely satisfied (78.9% vs 35.3%, p = 0.003) with sacral nerve stimulation as well as very much better (68.4% vs 17.6%, p = 0.002) according to the PGI-I. There was no difference between the groups in the number of women with a 50% or greater symptom reduction on voiding diary. Conclusions: Participating in a group shared appointment before sacral nerve stimulation improved patient preparedness and perceived outcomes of treatment, although there was no difference in objective outcomes based on voiding diary.

AB - Purpose: We assessed how a group shared appointment influenced patient preparedness for sacral nerve stimulation for refractory overactive bladder and/or urge urinary incontinence. We also evaluated subjective and objective outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients considering sacral nerve stimulation were prospectively enrolled and invited to attend a group shared appointment. This 75-minute presentation included a question and answer period with an implanting surgeon and an implanted patient. Control patients received standard office counseling. A patient preparedness questionnaire was completed after the group shared appointment or office counseling. Response to treatment was determined using the postoperative satisfaction questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and voiding diaries. Results: In our study 36 women with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 15 years underwent sacral nerve stimulation. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the 19 women who attended the group shared appointment and the 17 controls. Overall preparedness was greater in the shared appointment group (p = 0.043) with better understanding of the purpose of (p = 0.003) and alternatives to (p = 0.043) sacral nerve stimulation. Significantly more women in the shared appointment group than controls felt completely prepared (78.9% vs 29.4%, p = 0.003) and completely satisfied (78.9% vs 35.3%, p = 0.003) with sacral nerve stimulation as well as very much better (68.4% vs 17.6%, p = 0.002) according to the PGI-I. There was no difference between the groups in the number of women with a 50% or greater symptom reduction on voiding diary. Conclusions: Participating in a group shared appointment before sacral nerve stimulation improved patient preparedness and perceived outcomes of treatment, although there was no difference in objective outcomes based on voiding diary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880038545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880038545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.025

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.025

M3 - Article

C2 - 23499745

AN - SCOPUS:84880038545

VL - 190

SP - 594

EP - 597

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 2

ER -